Lately I’ve been thinking about quotes. While many quotes seem to try to encourage or lead us on, I think that they also have their limitations.
Many quotes are used without an understanding of the background or the context from which they are originally taken.
One of the main parts of context is the historical place. In other words, what was happening in the world, or in the life of the person being quoted, at the time the quotation is said, always gives more understanding about an issue than just a simple quote.
(However, a quote, like a Bible verse, can give light and help to a darkened mind of ignorant heart. . . . So much as said).
—————————————————————————
A college I used to attend uses a method of learning based on discussion—the give-and-take of people reflecting back thoughts in order to gain clarity and further understanding.
So there is always greater understanding to be gained—especially when the issue has to do with how to live or what to live for.
I just looked up the word, “dialectic,” and it says it is the process of coming together in search of truth, or arguing between two opinions in the hope of coming to greater understand truth.
Today’s culture, being post-modern, says there is no such thing as objective truth, no such thing as something being true for all people, for all time, in all places. In a culture such as this, the winning truth, slogan, or idea is often the one that speaks the loudest.
So I think it would behoove a person, instead of just looking for quotes to match the moment or to motivate some one, to strive to understand the culture and the historical context which gives rise to the things people say, and the words that carry meaning.
And, yes, in coming to understand truth, we need conversation, we need the use of logic and debate, we need to ask critical questions such as “what is the reason behind what is said?” And “is the quote descriptive or prescriptive?” And “how good is the evidence?” And of course, “what is the context?”
Just some thoughts I’ve been thinking about lately . . .